#33 Added by Neira 6 years ago
It seems that some folks like to use Around strictly for RP while others like to use it to chat (often OOC) with un-teamed homins in the immediate vicinity without the hassles of making teams or leagues that dissolve as soon as the conversation is over. And that has led to a bit of conflict between those who have differing views on what Around is really for.
#34 Added by Luminatrix 6 years ago
@GidgetThat's the point, i'm not RPing rn since.... Forum isn't RP ( Except dedicated part of it... ) so, your argument is quite.. unlucky :PAnd... Don't try to say something like " Yeah, if i don't RP, that's because of RPers behavior. " You don't RP because you don't like to or just because that's not the way you want to play. And that's the same for at least 90% of the non RP players.Maybe some rejected RP because they had bad experience of it, but most just don't care.Maybe with an explanation of different kind of RP and habits... Some would maybe understand it and like to learn it, but, that's on an another topic.
---
#35 Added by Placio 6 years ago
Last edited by Tamarea (6 years ago)
#36 Added by Gidget 6 years ago
Edited 4 times | Last edited by Tamarea (6 years ago)
#37 Added by Neira 6 years ago
@Neira - For largely the same reason I feel Revvy's 2-line idea is not a real solution.
Last edited by Neira (6 years ago)
#38 Added by Naveruss 6 years ago
Last edited by Tamarea (6 years ago) | Reason: Edit to add language tags.
#39 Added by Magez 6 years ago
Gidget@Neira - For largely the same reason I feel Revvy's 2-line idea is not a real solution.This hardly provided any further information (comparable to the opening post of this thread).I'm not going to work my way through the pages of this thread where one might be able to find additional information as to what your point of view may or may not be just because the opening post failed to make an argument on its own.Additional channels will just separate the already small community more.Segregation as by your idea stands against a marginal amount of decency if we're following @Revvy's proposal.You're either supporting segregation or believe people are too illiterate and wilfully disruptive to have the tact adjusting their posting manners in an appropriate way.Take your pick.
Last edited by Magez (6 years ago)
#40 Added by Sinvaders 6 years ago
@Sinvaders - Maybe that was a poor choice of phrasing, but I've seen a minority think they are a landslide majority simply because they're obnoxiously loud often enough to feel the need to remind folks that there's more to demographics than merely how much you scream.
#41 Added by Jellona 6 years ago
Lastly, I don't exactly encourage differences so much as simply acknowledge them, try to respect everyone's right to individuality, and seek compromise even if that means stripping one side of privilege for the sake of equity. I want us all to get along as players even if our characters are in conflict, but that requires all sides to give a little.
#42 Added by Gidget 6 years ago
As well you’ve said, you’re playing at unconventional hours, so your point of view is probably bad, why would we listen you…?
It's just a matter of perception. In my own experience there is more people using around channel for RP than the one using it for HRP
#43 Added by Jellona 6 years ago
#44 Added by Naveruss 6 years ago
#45 Added by Bitttymacod 6 years ago
#46 Added by Gidget 6 years ago
Of course, my last point wasn’t serious, just a sophism example (as I’ve said) because I’m tired to see all bad arguments against the RP.I’m not here to disrespect you or anybody. And it’s probably not noticeable, but I’m trying to understand all point of view, and I’m expecting that everybody can understand the point of view of most RP player: We don’t want to impose our way of play, we just ask to respect our way of playing the game without being rejected.We aren’t here for conflict or “segregation” but for get fun together.
Edited 2 times | Last edited by Tamarea (6 years ago)
#47 Added by Revvy 6 years ago
This topic is locked
powered by ryzom-api