DISCUSSIONS AROUND ONGOING PROJECTS


Do you agree with the four proposals detailed in this first post? / Approuvez-vous les quatre propositions présentées dans ce premier post ?
I agree with proposal 1. / J'approuve la proposition 1. 21 (1)
9.2%
I disagree with proposal 1. / Je désapprouve la proposition 1. 29 (4)
12.7%
I agree with proposal 2. / J'approuve la proposition 2. 50 (5)
21.8%
I disagree with proposal 2. / Je désapprouve la proposition 2. 8 (1)
3.5%
I agree with proposal 3. / J'approuve la proposition 3. 49 (6)
21.4%
I disagree with proposal 3. / Je désapprouve la proposition 3. 8
3.5%
I agree with proposal 4. / J'approuve la proposition 4. 53 (5)
23.1%
I disagree with proposal 4. / Je désapprouve la proposition 4. 7
3.1%
Other 4
1.7%
Abstain 4
Poll is closed
uiWebPrevious1234uiWebNext

#27 Report | Quote[fr] 

I missed this poll because I rarely troll the forums.
But I like #2 and #4, none of the rest.

But also see my post in the suggestions forum section. Revvy expanded one of my thoughts there and I applied it to OP.

Imagine OP wars where if you are higher than the OP level, your skills and levels cap at OP level. It would make life more interesting.

---

#28 Report | Quote[fr] 

Well yes, there is a % of the player base that's sole goal is to "have all the toys and not let anyone else play with them". There's nothing I can say or was attempting to say that would discourage that mindset.

I am speaking to the fact that level 50s players are limited in the size of their playground. And having the heroes from Marvel and DC fighting it out in THEIR playground is not conducive to player retention. And with level 35 players being subject to auto tagging when they want no part of it would not be welcome.

The lower level OPS only exist in the younger guilds hands because they have no value. Put 250 OP mats in there and you will have 28 Ops controlled by 2 groups who basically rarely log in for anything else but:

a) Server robots
b) OP battles

And everyone else is shut out from participating

---

#29 Report | Quote[fr] 

Not just because I am a fellow bunny, but I truly agree with FF's sentiment. If 250s want to fight for a minimally advantageous OP let them do it at the level of the OP (scale them down). But certainly do not have lvl 50 OP produce anything BUT lvl 50 mats. That is just beyond game breaking for new players.

What happens if we get new players and they see high levels ruining/running every aspect of the game? They either aspire to get to that level as fast as possible or they give up.

With the bugs and performance of this game compared to other games on the market (even free ones) I'd think they would burn out or just quit. Then what? Do you want to play ONLY with the same old tired names that disappear over time slowly and not see many new people?

Start thinking of the big picture, having your cake and eating it too is not helpful to the majority nor helpful to growing our population. Think before you vote people. You'll vote yourself out of a game sooner than later if you don't think.

---

#30 Report | Quote[en] 

Sarpedonia
With the bugs and performance of this game compared to other games on the market (even free ones) I'd think they would burn out or just quit. Then what? Do you want to play ONLY with the same old tired names that disappear over time slowly and not see many new people?
Well, OP or not, change or not; players are not interested into this very slow-paced game in 2019.
Gameplay is slow and boring and the mentality is slow and static (even if very helpfull and welcoming)

With all the free to play game outta here, that do provide content and surf on the modern wave.
One just try the game, realize what Ryzom is and leave ;)

It is certainly not because of 250 taking q50 OP that the game die, and will continue to do so.
Not to mention for 10€ sub i can have better game, so why spend my money here? -> is the real deal.

-
At this state of the game, and the actual very low players base, we may be good to put all OP mats 250 and craft q50 to q200 weapons with it.
No waste anyway ;)

Oh.. and btw did you notice, its almost gonna be one year we are waiting the promised change ? :P

Last edited by Revvy (6 years ago)

---

#31 Report | Quote[fr] 

I was meaning in general. If changes are to be done to the game and people complain, they need to realize changes happen to attract new PAYING people. OP is just one of those. Votes on anything, if they are to steer the game direction, will have a impact on more than just OP discussions.

---

#32 Report | Quote[en] 

Revvy
Well, OP or not, change or not; players are not interested into this very slow-paced game in 2019.
Gameplay is slow and boring and the mentality is slow and static (even if very helpful and welcoming)

Please recognize that this is YOUR point of view and is not representative of the entire population. All of us experience the game depending upon who we interact with when we are on line. But when one's exposure is limited to a group that rarely logs in except under certain instances (Bosshunts / OP Battles), they're not interacting with a large portion of the server population. The people I see every day chatting in Uni and in PMs are clearly not bored, and do not consider the game slow paced. The games viability dictates that their PoV is just as valid as yours..

I've been playing 15 years, I'm not bored.... I maintain my subscription to the game even when I need a break to take care of RL. I try and say hello to any new players I see, ask if they have any questions and listen to the views expressed. I don't play in level 50 areas but I have no desire to take them away from them.

"Remember, grasshopper, it's the journey, not the destination "

If you want to have a bunch of 250 players to run around and bash skulls with, no one is stopping you. My sons played high school sports. But my 12th grader never played against the 9th graders and neither of those played against the 6th graders. Point of information ... it's not fun for the lower classmen as they'd be either riding the bench or, if they got in, would not have an opportunity to impact the outcome.

I don't have a horse in this race. I doubt there's a single GH that doesn't have a store of OP mats that would last months if every OP broke today. Making all OPs 250 ? What's the goal ? ... so every player at an OP battle has a 250 Supreme Vedice Boosted Weapon and Armor set ?

Last edited by Fyrosfreddy (6 years ago)

---

#33 Report | Quote[en] 

[quote=Fyrosfreddy]
Revvy
...players are not interested into this very slow-paced game in 2019...

Ryzom is one of very few realtime games I ever played. Guess why...

#34 Report | Quote[en] 

Yes yes, whatever :)

First, you are preaching a converted (this game good, and it is also a waste in my opinion).

Guys don't feel insulted or anything right, but you need to see what Ryzom is for real, and the reality of the game business and clients expectation in 2019 (modern era).
Where even retro game need to be intouch and is matter to surf on.

That all, it is not against you personally.

Glad you are hooked to this game and its really nice but it lack interest for thousands reasons and it is proved.
If you are retired or under linux, it could be a cheap solution to ease your mind in a (not so)mmo(not so)rpg :P

Until the day we have 500(+) players on the server, it is the reality, and ill be glad this day to backup this comment ;)

---

#35 Report | Quote[en] 

The whole current outpost system is a nest egg for pensioners.

Imagine...
* Throw out the entire current outpost implementation.
* Remove all TPs and respawn points from PR.
* Make PR full open GvG, required, not optional.
* Have all outposts in PR available on a first-come first-served basis, simply by whoever constructs buildings there.
* Whoever pays the dappers to construct the outpost building gets the building.
* Building starts at low HP, half full.
* Once the building is regenned to full HP (constructed), it can be upgraded, again using more dappers.
* Anyone can attack to destroy outpost buildings at any time.
* A free-for-all placement of guard buildings and towers by anyone, anywhere, in PR, for a fair amount of dappers, with inventory space for launcher ammo (or for digging).
* All upgraded buildings can spawn a specific amount of decent guard NPCs at a specific rate, NPC type and strength depending on the building type and construction level.
* Buildings can be repeatedly upgraded to higher levels, for higher amounts of dappers, as soon as each construction phase finishes.
* Regular waves of Kitins who may massively take over an entire PR zone.

Edited 5 times | Last edited by Kaetemi (6 years ago)

---

Kaetemi

#36 Report | Quote[en] 

Kaetemi
* Building starts at low HP, half full.
* Once the building is regenned to full HP (constructed), it can be upgraded, again using more dappers.

I had a similar idea that I explained to some people. Everyone was interested by the idea :)
There is a lot to do with outpost to give them real values.

#37 Report | Quote[en] 

Kaetemi
* Throw out the entire current outpost implementation.
* Remove all TPs and respawn points from PR.
* Make PR full open GvG, required, not optional.
* Have all outposts in PR available on a first-come first-served basis, simply by whoever constructs buildings there.
* Whoever pays the dappers to construct the outpost building gets the building.
...
To add to your idea Kaetemi:

Allow players to teleport on the possessed outpost to give building (and the whole system) a great value.

Last edited by Revvy (6 years ago)

---

#38 Report | Quote[en] 

Sinvaders
I had a similar idea that I explained to some people. Everyone was interested by the idea :)

I'm curious to hear it.

Revvy
To add to your idea Kaetemi:

Allow players to teleport on the possessed outpost to give building (and the whole system) a great value.

That may need to be restricted to only serve players who don't have DP - to avoid the 'infinite lives' battle.

---

Kaetemi

#39 Report | Quote[en] 

Kaetemi
That may need to be restricted to only serve players who don't have DP - to avoid the 'infinite lives' battle.

What do you think about this ?

A respawn limitation counter, in each outpost zone (like 20 respawns let's say - adjustable by design)

If the PvE env or the opponents get you more than 20 times before you reach your goal;
You are losing the possibility to respawn on this outpost zone (tactically you may respawn on another outpost zone).

So the outpost can be taken over.
And it will push people to be rewarded in the survival, favor the escape route to counter attack somewhere else.
Instead of spawning, heal and comeback infinitely.

Edited 3 times | Last edited by Revvy (6 years ago)

---

#40 Report | Quote[en] 

Revvy
If the PvE env or the opponents get you more than 20 times before you reach your goal;
You are losing the possibility to respawn on this outpost zone (tactically you may respawn on another outpost zone).

So the outpost can be taken over.
And it will push people to be rewarded in the survival, favor the escape route to counter attack somewhere else.
Instead of spawning, heal and comeback infinitely.

Hmm. I think the outpost owners would already be at a tactical advantage from simply having the outpost, and the accompanying NPCs.. The attackers still have to spend time to destroy the outpost building -- for a well upgraded outpost this may already take longer than traveling an army back to the outpost. Also throw in healer NPCs (spawn yourself a healer squad instead of respawning), and you've got yourself a pretty nice fortress. Giving the defenders a 'multiple rounds' advantage seems a bit too much 'easy mode' and may tip the balance too much.

Let's say you have a pretty good guild with a nice outpost, and some allies. You've got another guild attacking your outpost with their allies[*]. Your guild can quickly port into the outpost the first round to do the initial defense, together with NPCs -- at this point you have a guild with their allies attacking vs. a guild with NPCs, which can be relatively fair. Your allies are traveling in. Perhaps you fail to defend your outpost, and you all die. Maybe you have your allies tactically wait for your team to join up, or you have them advance. Either way, let's say the opposing guild destroys the outpost building. At this point they can build and have a weak non-functional outpost building -- and now they become the defenders. However, as long as the buildings are not constructed and not upgraded, they cannot get the NPCs yet. You are at this point still completely capable of regaining your outpost, by attacking it, and neither guilds have an advantage now.

Though, if one of your allies happens to have an outpost nearby, it can serve as a regrouping base... Perhaps they could even dispatch their NPC guards.

[*] An alliance system between guilds. Works like making facebook friends. In GvG anyone should be able to heal anyone directly, and allies can still be attacked directly (betrayal!), but AoE healing spells should only affect guild members and allies, offensive AoE should only affect non-allies.

At some point the whole process becomes a battle of resources. Either guilds fight each other to attempt gaining whatever they can gain from outposts, but they end up draining each other's resources.. and in the end the Kitins win... or... There should not be any artificial boundaries or disadvantages to launching an attack, to ensure that a stalemate doesn't develop. :)

Edited 2 times | Last edited by Kaetemi (6 years ago)

---

Kaetemi

#41 Report | Quote[fr] 

@kaetemi: I'll look for the small pdf i have written and will put it here.
uiWebPrevious1234uiWebNext
 
Last visit Friday, 22 November 07:53:15 UTC
P_:G_:PLAYER

powered by ryzom-api