IDEAS FOR RYZOM


uiWebPrevious1uiWebNext

#1 [en] 

Devs that is not good.

#2 [en] 

i will test it out in the next weeks

#3 [en] 

?

#4 [en] 

Declaring war costs dappers, if a F2P is given dappers / able to afford this and is also GL / HO why would he/she not be allowed to click an OP? I don't see the problem.

arc

---

#5 [en] 

Arcueid
Declaring war costs dappers, if a F2P is given dappers / able to afford this and is also GL / HO why would he/she not be allowed to click an OP? I don't see the problem.

I agree. The cost of declaring on a 250 outpost is quite high, so the only practical way an F2P toon can declare is if they're a sock puppet for a subbed player. Add in what even one multi-master can do do F2P toons and the only time you might see this is if someone makes a lame attempt an anonymity that will disappear the instant first contact is made, generally long before the actual start time.

In other words, I don't see a problem here.

---

Do not assume that you speak for all just because you are the loudest voice; there are many who disagree that simply have no desire to waste words on you.

#6 [en] 

My suspicion is that not a f2p player, but a formerly subbed player now using the possibility of logging in like f2p, did these clicks.

It would mean that the Devs haven't yet closed that loophole. In this case, a decent approach by the player would be reporting the vulnerability but abstaining from abusing it (one time for test purposes ofc would not constitute abuse). On the Dev's and CSR's side, it would be wise to acknowledge such a bug and declare that further abuse of it would lead to an abortion of the OP war initiated without compensation, with the right reserved to punish the abuser.

---

Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral
uiWebPrevious1uiWebNext
 
Last visit Tuesday, 26 November 11:24:51 UTC
P_:G_:PLAYER

powered by ryzom-api