#96 Ajouté par Tamarea il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
---
#97 Ajouté par Nudge il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
Dernière édition par Nudge (il y a 7 ans).
#98 Ajouté par Placio il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
#99 Ajouté par Dukenono il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
Edité 2 fois | Dernière édition par Dukenono (il y a 7 ans).
#100 Ajouté par Arfur il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
I.... this is not what I expected.I was hoping that dappers could be purchased for real money, and what can be purchased with dappers would be increased.
#101 Ajouté par Sinvaders il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
#102 Ajouté par Gidget il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
NudgeI.... this is not what I expected.I was hoping that dappers could be purchased for real money, and what can be purchased with dappers would be increased.That sounds like a pay to win system, which I'm pretty sure would not be acceptable.
Dernière édition par Gidget (il y a 7 ans).
#103 Ajouté par Skiy il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
Dernière édition par Skiy (il y a 7 ans).
#104 Ajouté par Nudge il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
#105 Ajouté par Aenigma il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
My thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.
#106 Ajouté par Nudge il y a 7 ans Reporter | Citer
NudgeMy thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.Nudge, if those of us who pay each month had only the same items as those who are f2P the game would probably cease to exist within a couple months.Try to see it as rewarding for monthly payments, rather than punishment for F2P, please? ;)
powered by ryzom-api