[Done] Ryzom will move to a real Free to Play concept! - OFFICIAL NEWS

#103 Added by Skiy 7 years ago Report | Quote Multilingual

I agree with Gid and I would gladly be in favor of the ability to purchase more or larger apartments, guild halls, and/or packer/mounts.

Last edited by Skiy (7 years ago)

---

#104 Added by Nudge 7 years ago Report | Quote [en]

{translate}

My thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.

Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.

Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.

#105 Added by Aenigma 7 years ago Report | Quote [en]

{translate}

Nudge

My thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.

Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.

Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.

Nudge, if those of us who pay each month had only the same items as those who are f2P the game would probably cease to exist within a couple months.
Try to see it as rewarding for monthly payments, rather than punishment for F2P, please? ;)

#106 Added by Nudge 7 years ago Report | Quote [en]

{translate}

I can understand that it helps or rewards continued subscribers.

I was just hoping it would attract more F2P, or Fremium players which would be a potential paying players.

I was mistaken as to the purpose of this shift.

Aenigma

Nudge
My thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.

Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.

Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.

Nudge, if those of us who pay each month had only the same items as those who are f2P the game would probably cease to exist within a couple months.
Try to see it as rewarding for monthly payments, rather than punishment for F2P, please? ;)