#102 Added by Gidget 7 years ago Report | Quote
NudgeI.... this is not what I expected.I was hoping that dappers could be purchased for real money, and what can be purchased with dappers would be increased.That sounds like a pay to win system, which I'm pretty sure would not be acceptable.
I.... this is not what I expected.I was hoping that dappers could be purchased for real money, and what can be purchased with dappers would be increased.
Last edited by Gidget (7 years ago)
---
#103 Added by Skiy 7 years ago Report | Quote
Last edited by Skiy (7 years ago)
#104 Added by Nudge 7 years ago Report | Quote
#105 Added by Aenigma 7 years ago Report | Quote
My thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.
#106 Added by Nudge 7 years ago Report | Quote
NudgeMy thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.Nudge, if those of us who pay each month had only the same items as those who are f2P the game would probably cease to exist within a couple months.Try to see it as rewarding for monthly payments, rather than punishment for F2P, please? ;)
powered by ryzom-api