#22 Added by Zilon 10 years ago
Last edited by Tiximei (10 years ago) | Reason: Fixed language button
#23 Added by Daomei 10 years ago
Last edited by Daomei (10 years ago)
---
#24 Added by Azazor 10 years ago
Last edited by Azazor (10 years ago)
#25 Added by Maxxye 10 years ago
Being in a guild with someone who follows a different belief does not mean by any means you do not roleplay and in fact, can mean quite the opposite. I wish people would rid themselves of this ridiculous french view-point that goes as follows:'gasp! you are kami and I am kara! I must never ever speak to you and spend my entire time being an utter ass towards you!'.
As to two shards what about those of us (like myself) who want to do RP PvE?PvP and PvE are not inherently correlated to RP and HRP.
#26 Added by Djaimse 10 years ago
#27 Added by Suboxide 10 years ago
I wonder what will be the next great idea :DWhy not come 10years back to the inital "The saga of Ryzom", with only 2 factions, restricted access to guilds ( like now, no point to open guilds anyways).Why not 2 shards ? One RP-PVP and one PVE ?Looks like some just want to ruin the game, just for their comfort...
#28 Added by Zilon 10 years ago
If we need to play toughether then we need to give and take but so far it's been only give to the RP and take from non RP ppl non stop
#29 Added by Suboxide 10 years ago
#30 Added by Daomei 10 years ago
Daomei : tout d'abord, je pense que ce serait bien de faire ce qu'il faut avec tes écrits pour qu'il soit possible de les traduire facilement sur le forum.
#31 Added by Maxxye 10 years ago
Maxxye (atys)I wonder what will be the next great idea :DWhy not come 10years back to the inital "The saga of Ryzom", with only 2 factions, restricted access to guilds ( like now, no point to open guilds anyways).Why not 2 shards ? One RP-PVP and one PVE ?Looks like some just want to ruin the game, just for their comfort...hmm so choose the 1 server should be RP-PVP? > who is killing this game for his own comfort? > If we need to play toughether then we need to give and take but so far it's been only give to the RP and take from non RP ppl non stop
#32 Added by Bitttymacod 10 years ago
I am not sure if I understood you right, Djaimse, but I changed my posts to multilingual/EN in case you want to rely on automatic translation. Mind that Goo-Translate is in fact Goo, poor translation bound to misunderstanding.
{some stuff trimmed}Ari was not that RP-intensive, according to my impressions (i peeked into all 3 servers at those times and eagerly read all forums, but surely i may missed a lot). Their dedication to the Lore was laxer, to my impression, and so was the impact of RP to everyday's gameplay (Ari players please correct me if I am wrong).
#33 Added by Rikutatis 10 years ago
#34 Added by Virg 10 years ago
#35 Added by Zilon 10 years ago
Essentially I believe my idea still can work as long as there are good enough advantages for having an aligned guild, keeping the impact of the roleplay decision to have an aligned guild. Riku I understand removing PR tps would fit the situation but I believe it is too restricting- and I believe the aligned guilds should gain benefits- rather than the non-aligned guilds loose them.
Last edited by Zilon (10 years ago)
#36 Added by Virg 10 years ago
powered by ryzom-api