#116 Added by Mokoi(arispotle) 1 decade ago
Last edited by Mokoi(arispotle) (1 decade ago)
#117 Added by Beeficus 1 decade ago
BeeficusI really dont care about anything but getting the answers that will stop more players from leaving.I can say one thing about this. Stop being a jerk. All you do is badmouth everyone. I have NEVER heard you say One nice thing about anyone. Let it be Kara, Kami or CSR. You keep demanding stuff and badmouthing everyone.No wonder nobody likes you.... Your own guildies don't like you they tolerate you because you been playing Ryzom for a while that is the sad truth of it.Zipp it sit in a corner and do your foraging with your 4 Bots.
I really dont care about anything but getting the answers that will stop more players from leaving.
Edited 2 times | Last edited by Beeficus (1 decade ago)
---
#118 Added by Beeficus 1 decade ago
So any software that it can make auto keying, or spreading keypresses into multibox is forbidden and will be dealt with by our team. So if CSR have conclusive evidence, or witness such activities all accounts concerned can be subject to sanctions
Edited 2 times | Last edited by Beeficus (1 decade ago) | Reason: Remembering my manners
#119 Added by Ciliana 1 decade ago
#120 Added by Gorran 1 decade ago
To those of you new to Ryzom:You can have as many accounts and (alt)ernate characters as you like.It is forbidden to use technology that assists in playing the game unattended.It is forbidden to use technology that can make auto keying, or spreading keypresses into multibox/clients.Back in January 2011 Yumeroh (Head of Support and Community Manager) made this statement hereOn provision of evidence that players have breached these game rules will be (and have been) sanctioned.Evidence ,Judgements and sanctions are all confidential.
Last edited by Gorran (1 decade ago)
#121 Added by Erizon(arispotle) 1 decade ago
Mokoi, thank you for your response, could you please clarify what will be accepted as "conclusive evidence"? This is the issue. Due to your policy of steering well clear of OP battles, CSR's have declined to show up to "witness such activities". The topic here is the alleged use of 3rd party software to control many accounts during OP battles, to gain a substantial advantage that is proving extremely difficult to overcome.What I have seen as well as many others cannot be explained by things like "uber gaming setups". No matter how many PC's and how much you spend on them you can only press keys on so many keyboards at once without growing extra arms. We feel that If it was witnessed from our point of view it would be undeniable.
#122 Added by Beeficus 1 decade ago
#123 Added by Erizon(arispotle) 1 decade ago
Just to clarity, one key press per client is the ruling factor then?
#124 Added by Beeficus 1 decade ago
All of these things help the advanced player significantly speed up activities, and could be seen by the unwashed masses of mouth-breathing keyboard-turners as God-like synchronization that must be illegal.
#125 Added by Kwipers 1 decade ago
#126 Added by Yakapo 1 decade ago
Last edited by Yakapo (1 decade ago)
#127 Added by Liliang 1 decade ago
#128 Added by Beeficus 1 decade ago
#129 Added by Beeficus 1 decade ago
This thread has gone on long enough. So I will explain our tactics to you and you can take your view from there....... So I can see how this setup would look like a bot. When it is in fact a bunch of people nukeing or healing off of the key people's target. So what you guys call cheating on our part is just simple lack of using the tools you have available to you.
#130 Added by Erizon(arispotle) 1 decade ago
ErizonAll of these things help the advanced player significantly speed up activities, and could be seen by the unwashed masses of mouth-breathing keyboard-turners as God-like synchronization that must be illegal.When you are complaining about other peoples posts causing drama you may consider wording your own more carefully. There is a clear difference between speed and synchronicity and suggesting that we are too unevolved to see it is just argumentative.
What you seem to be implying is that there is no possible way to prove 3rd party software use and therefor the rule is unenforceable. If that is the case I would like to hear it from Mokoi. Please keep in mind questions here are being posed to him for an official answer and your responses have not addressed them, even if you could speak on his behalf.
This topic is locked
powered by ryzom-api