I think the system as it is, isn't all that bad
Talkirc may be right, that everyone may have a reason to fight anyone once in a while. However, i think that no one should be rewarded for hunting their allies.
Also a true neutral player shouldn't be doing any PvP, becasue well that's pretty much what being neutral is about. If you join the fight, you take sides and you are no longer neutral. And that is correctly reflected in the current system, a neutral palyers gets no points and gives no points.
And that is one thing that is always getting confused, a neutral players is not at 50 fame, a neutral player is at 0 fame
at 50 fame, you are hominist and a hominist fighting a hominist shouldn't be right, however a hominist fighting a marauder should be getting maximum. If that's not the case, that's not the intention of the current system and is an ovbvious bug.
Talkirc may be right, that everyone may have a reason to fight anyone once in a while. However, i think that no one should be rewarded for hunting their allies.
Also a true neutral player shouldn't be doing any PvP, becasue well that's pretty much what being neutral is about. If you join the fight, you take sides and you are no longer neutral. And that is correctly reflected in the current system, a neutral palyers gets no points and gives no points.
And that is one thing that is always getting confused, a neutral players is not at 50 fame, a neutral player is at 0 fame
at 50 fame, you are hominist and a hominist fighting a hominist shouldn't be right, however a hominist fighting a marauder should be getting maximum. If that's not the case, that's not the intention of the current system and is an ovbvious bug.
---
The only sane man is the one who considers himself to be insane. Im sane, btw. }¦-)>