Talk, as MJ already described, at 50 fame all civs you are pro-civ, even if you are un-aligned.
The original basis of pvp points was that the faction paid them to you, no? So the fame score seems to be a way to preserve that concept without having seperate pvp point totals (by faction). So you can pvp anyone you want but there would need to be a pro or anti faction willing to pay you...
And to relate it back to Casy's original post, people who have very different backgrounds could still end up with no points because of the cancelling effect of shared fames. I agree that effect should be reduced/eliminated by changing the calculations or fame thresholds...
The original basis of pvp points was that the faction paid them to you, no? So the fame score seems to be a way to preserve that concept without having seperate pvp point totals (by faction). So you can pvp anyone you want but there would need to be a pro or anti faction willing to pay you...
And to relate it back to Casy's original post, people who have very different backgrounds could still end up with no points because of the cancelling effect of shared fames. I agree that effect should be reduced/eliminated by changing the calculations or fame thresholds...