This request pops up again and again, and every time we saw there are those who prefer GvG and those who prefer AvA.
We have 24 active outposts, and more could easily be activated: Is it really so hard to have both some OPs that are GvG-only and some OPs that are AvA, and make both sides happy?
We could've even had a third group of outposts that were GvG PvE-only (only players vs guards, no opposing players) for those players that hated PvP, back when we still had a large group of those. Would've made them happy too.
Or do both sides insist -all- OPs must be their preferred method?
I really have no preference anymore myself. Though the extensive politics caused by AvA that AvA-proponents enjoyed seems mostly dead now anyways, so perhaps GvG would be better at this point.
We have 24 active outposts, and more could easily be activated: Is it really so hard to have both some OPs that are GvG-only and some OPs that are AvA, and make both sides happy?
We could've even had a third group of outposts that were GvG PvE-only (only players vs guards, no opposing players) for those players that hated PvP, back when we still had a large group of those. Would've made them happy too.
Or do both sides insist -all- OPs must be their preferred method?
I really have no preference anymore myself. Though the extensive politics caused by AvA that AvA-proponents enjoyed seems mostly dead now anyways, so perhaps GvG would be better at this point.