Azazor
Retournez lire vos cours de philo: la liberté n'est pas l'absence de règles. Vous ne perdez pas en liberté parce que vous n'avez plus le droit de faire cela. Vous perdez des possibilités de jeu, c'est tout. Mais vous êtes toujours libres d'agir dans un cadre.
**DEL** Disrespectfull I know I will not be able to reach out to you Azazor, it is clear that you and I stand too far from each other to find any common ground in this matter. However, I need to make a comment on what you just say here. Does logic mean something different in french? Losing playing possibilities IS a restriction in freedom. This is completely detached from the rest of your reasoning about acting within a certain framework. What you are doing here is cherry-picking certain parts of this argument, calling it logic but it only serves to suit your own philosophical agenda. Restriction of possibility IS a restriction of freedom; any other reasoning would be dumb.
And this is what this debate is about, restricting freedom of players through an aspect of the game called multi-boxing and stalking out a discourse on a “correct” way of playing the game. In other words: restricting freedom to tailor individual players game style within the frames of common acceptance (what is considered cheating).