As far as I'm concerned, the restriction in inviting non-attached or non-nationals is more of an artificial restriction. That one can invite for example Kami oriented homins to only one Kami guild, but not to any neutral.
I also understand the point of view of orientation in the game. Kamis belong to kamis, marauders to maraudeurs etc.. Then you have a common goal, a common root as far as RP is concerned, but also common teleportation points, which simplifies a lot, in a practical way. The same goes for the nations.
But does this agreement have to be regulated on the basis of a restriction in the game, or can it be agreed between homins? Perhaps other regulations could be better for the guild?
But as I observe, this strict separation visibly no longer exists. Maybe a reaction to the Kitins?
I know, of course, that many PVP players want the old fractional PVP back. But it seems that the wars today are no longer based on the beliefs of a faction or nation, but more on individualism. The Kalamar Alliance also shows that. When it comes to conflicts, it seems to me that it's more about past bad contacts or just enjoying a fight.
Of course, such guild constellations, consisting of all factions, would have an enormous potential for conflict when it comes to fighting, but then it would be more personal. Many compromises would have to be made in RP.
In the end, it's not about mixing everything up and not seeing clear boundaries between beliefs of a faction or a nation, but the possibility to work together in a guild despite opposing faction/nation, which is not a must.
I also wanted to remind you that the fractional PVP, which is more like a death match today, was subject to restrictions in the past. If this is what most people are in favor of, then the guild limit should also be changed.
Personally, I think freedom in a sandbox game is like dancing on a razor blade. You can fall left or right, but even if you're careless, you can split in two. That's why it would be great if there were always a lot of constructive opinions.
Thanks!
I also understand the point of view of orientation in the game. Kamis belong to kamis, marauders to maraudeurs etc.. Then you have a common goal, a common root as far as RP is concerned, but also common teleportation points, which simplifies a lot, in a practical way. The same goes for the nations.
But does this agreement have to be regulated on the basis of a restriction in the game, or can it be agreed between homins? Perhaps other regulations could be better for the guild?
But as I observe, this strict separation visibly no longer exists. Maybe a reaction to the Kitins?
I know, of course, that many PVP players want the old fractional PVP back. But it seems that the wars today are no longer based on the beliefs of a faction or nation, but more on individualism. The Kalamar Alliance also shows that. When it comes to conflicts, it seems to me that it's more about past bad contacts or just enjoying a fight.
Of course, such guild constellations, consisting of all factions, would have an enormous potential for conflict when it comes to fighting, but then it would be more personal. Many compromises would have to be made in RP.
In the end, it's not about mixing everything up and not seeing clear boundaries between beliefs of a faction or a nation, but the possibility to work together in a guild despite opposing faction/nation, which is not a must.
I also wanted to remind you that the fractional PVP, which is more like a death match today, was subject to restrictions in the past. If this is what most people are in favor of, then the guild limit should also be changed.
Personally, I think freedom in a sandbox game is like dancing on a razor blade. You can fall left or right, but even if you're careless, you can split in two. That's why it would be great if there were always a lot of constructive opinions.
Thanks!