Agree with these idea, it would be nice gameplay wise (and content adding, even if minor).
It isnt different than the current system, tho in this case "same spell" will be stackable, wich is very usefull.
We already try to remember the position of spells, so the ones with different credits by example, will not change much from before.
I would say, this is a different staff that should handle "infrastructure" problem and IG idea of contents to add, but we are out of the subject here.
And obviously, fixing infrastructure problem is the priority, wich also shouldn't play a big role into content adding or review of idea by the staff.
@Jahuu, nice crystal :)
Aleeskandaro
I think both ideas are great, however given the wide variety of spells you can crystalise (with different credits) maybe making them stackable wouldn't be as doable ? but i'm just guessing.
It isnt different than the current system, tho in this case "same spell" will be stackable, wich is very usefull.
We already try to remember the position of spells, so the ones with different credits by example, will not change much from before.
Aleeskandaro
Also I personally would rather have them fix the recent issues (esp. subscriptions) before dispersing the already scarce workforce.
I would say, this is a different staff that should handle "infrastructure" problem and IG idea of contents to add, but we are out of the subject here.
And obviously, fixing infrastructure problem is the priority, wich also shouldn't play a big role into content adding or review of idea by the staff.
@Jahuu, nice crystal :)
---