I want to add something which is off topic in some way but important anyway. I do not want to appear arrogant with my reasoning, and want to keep in phase with other contributors.
I am aware that I am no angel when it comes to polemics. I am catty and not willing to take any attack unanswered (sometimes I hate myself for). I am aware, further, that my technique of polemics is fairly sophisticated and most times avoiding the pitfalls of CoC. That does not excuse that it is sometimes at least as if not more venomous than a simple "you are an <censored>".
I owe a lot to Wrox who once muted me in an Uni discussion telling me "I cannot blame you any CoC transgression, but the way you argue is stirring up everything". He was right, and I admitted fault to him. I can be a bitch.
I ask, honestly, everybody, to get back to a rational, peaceful, and respectful discussion. We may have different views, but should be able to seperate them from personal animosities and prejudices.
I am aware that I am no angel when it comes to polemics. I am catty and not willing to take any attack unanswered (sometimes I hate myself for). I am aware, further, that my technique of polemics is fairly sophisticated and most times avoiding the pitfalls of CoC. That does not excuse that it is sometimes at least as if not more venomous than a simple "you are an <censored>".
I owe a lot to Wrox who once muted me in an Uni discussion telling me "I cannot blame you any CoC transgression, but the way you argue is stirring up everything". He was right, and I admitted fault to him. I can be a bitch.
I ask, honestly, everybody, to get back to a rational, peaceful, and respectful discussion. We may have different views, but should be able to seperate them from personal animosities and prejudices.
---
Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral