By the way: even if a forum is OOC, why should IC be "forbidden" then? Isn't it just fine to roleplay where so ever in the environment of an MMORPG (massively multiplayer online roleplaying game) - as long as nobody is insulted and the Code of Conduct is not broken? You, Feylin, can of course also answer OOC.
Seems now that the real issue is about "not tolerating the histories and customs of other servers"?!
Why do you think the Event Team has asked us to show more respect to each other? For no reason?
Is it really asking too much for you as a player to be tolerant?
Viewing Honorary Initiates who earned their titles because of their services for the Theocracy as being similar to "real" Initiates IC is "imposing" what exactly on you as a player or doing what exactly to international roleplay? What are you even talking about? Aren't you blowing this out of proportions way too much?
Nothing would change - not even a tiny little bit if Zhoi was a "real" Initiate. And you know this very well.
Daomei is right: at the first Assembly (February 11th) we already had votings for national topics (first one being about the transporter of "To new horizons" started by Mabreka Cho) and some more times ever since; Zhois vote has always been counted exactly similar to that of any other Initiate.
So "my" status is not a "Leanon-issue", it has long since become an official part of the new Server Atys.
The idea of having Honorary Initiates was and still is an opportunity for more players to participate in political roleplaying, so that they will not have to leave their guilds nor change their gameplay to something that they do not enjoy any longer.
You might of course oppose this status IC, for what illogical reason whatsoever. But how can you possibly say OOC that someone wants to "impose" something on you by that - as a player? How intolerant can you be?
At the moment there is just one single character carrying a title that is just a little bit different from others, nothing more than that. It could have happened on any server.
Your character had and still has the chance to protest and discuss this. Well, your character has only just started to oppose that after our characters had begun to fight verbally.
This is perfectly logical as an IC-tactics.
But OOC it is not.
Feylin (atys)
Hm, wasn't the title of the thread "what about me?" :D Now about Zhoi's position, to speak openly , which is the purpose of this OOC thread : i feel Zhoi being honorary Initiate has no meaning for me. (Edit : this is one of the reasons i didn't involve in this issue with fyros) You can't oppose me something that existed on Leanon, because i could oppose you that it didn't in Aniro, this kind of argument is just senseless and leading to a dead end.
Seems now that the real issue is about "not tolerating the histories and customs of other servers"?!
Why do you think the Event Team has asked us to show more respect to each other? For no reason?
Is it really asking too much for you as a player to be tolerant?
Viewing Honorary Initiates who earned their titles because of their services for the Theocracy as being similar to "real" Initiates IC is "imposing" what exactly on you as a player or doing what exactly to international roleplay? What are you even talking about? Aren't you blowing this out of proportions way too much?
Nothing would change - not even a tiny little bit if Zhoi was a "real" Initiate. And you know this very well.
Daomei is right: at the first Assembly (February 11th) we already had votings for national topics (first one being about the transporter of "To new horizons" started by Mabreka Cho) and some more times ever since; Zhois vote has always been counted exactly similar to that of any other Initiate.
So "my" status is not a "Leanon-issue", it has long since become an official part of the new Server Atys.
The idea of having Honorary Initiates was and still is an opportunity for more players to participate in political roleplaying, so that they will not have to leave their guilds nor change their gameplay to something that they do not enjoy any longer.
You might of course oppose this status IC, for what illogical reason whatsoever. But how can you possibly say OOC that someone wants to "impose" something on you by that - as a player? How intolerant can you be?
At the moment there is just one single character carrying a title that is just a little bit different from others, nothing more than that. It could have happened on any server.
Your character had and still has the chance to protest and discuss this. Well, your character has only just started to oppose that after our characters had begun to fight verbally.
This is perfectly logical as an IC-tactics.
But OOC it is not.
---