#1 Eingetragen von Forgotenland vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
2 mal geändert | Zuletzt geändert von Forgotenland (vor 9 Jahren)
---
#2 Eingetragen von Bitttymacod vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
#3 Eingetragen von Forgotenland vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
weather granularity must be modified by something in the code because I have seen exe mats that are bi-weathered, mats that have cutoffs that are not on the boundaries of the best/good/poor/worst, etc. There is a preponderance of weather change on the 1/6 1/3 .... changes in the weather number, but that is not universal.
There is also a definite and substantial random factor on the impact of any action on the stability and life of a particular source. If you included that, I'm sure I didn't recognize it.
The most important thing to a harvester (at least to me and various I know) is how does the location where you stand affect popping of nodes in various combinations of angle and range, and that isn't addressed by your extraction of knowledge at all.
#4 Eingetragen von Mjollren vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
#5 Eingetragen von Forgotenland vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
#6 Eingetragen von Karu vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
Apparently there are two types of "bad" and "good" weather
#7 Eingetragen von Bitttymacod vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
I do note that the actual impact of any action to D or E can be anywhere (uniformly drawn) from 0x to 2x.
#8 Eingetragen von Forgotenland vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
there is also an interaction between D (source life) and E (stability) ((and the number of mats and time remaining- but that seems to be a second order effect))For instance in mode 3, the more that stability is greater than life (E>D) the more effect there is (on average) on life vs stability. In mode 5, as long as E>D both E and D tend to be affected together. Once E < D E is effected much more by each action.
#9 Eingetragen von Bitttymacod vor 9 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
#10 Eingetragen von Gidget vor 4 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
powered by ryzom-api