Refused - Ryzom Community Forum Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:59:12 +0000 ryApp::FeedBuilder 15 Refused - Ryzom Community Forum <![CDATA[Abolish artificial restriction "Fraction/Nation<->Guild]]> Sat, 18 May 2019 18:46:17 +0000 Refused
Sinvaders - Not really. But I can see how those who have a "Might makes right" attitude would prefer an RPG where there's a faction with that same attitude as a central tenet. And it's no surprise such players would seek to have the mechanics altered such that their preferred play style is given preferential treatment, or that those folks would accuse others of what they themselves are guilty of.

It amuses me that some folks are bent out of shape over an OP being obtained via RP instead of PvP. Maybe those folks are in the wrong genre? This isn't 2006; there's plenty of MOBAs out there for them. Look at what happened on Arispotle when PvP became a thing and remember that you share a server with folks like that. Folks who think "Neutral" is, by definition, an open-minded lack of bias.

If people can't respect their differences, they cannot respect people who are different. As one who believes in reciprocity, I feel those folks deserve any disrespect they get;actions have consequences.]]>
<![CDATA[Should we have a separate Roleplay channel?]]> Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:43:04 +0000 Refused We will not move towards a separation of channels between role-players and non-role-players, which would in fact imply an exclusion that we do not want, but towards guidance to help them play together, in mutual understanding and respect.]]> Tamarea <![CDATA[[Will not be used] Improvements for NH services]]> Wed, 07 May 2014 16:45:35 +0000 Refused
maybe they'll take my idea and put it to use, and we'll all get something we want, maybe not, but that's up to them, untill then we'll just have to send our bills for RSI to WG.

<![CDATA[[Idée impossible] Partage... Appartement et Hall]]> Fri, 02 May 2014 08:55:51 +0000 Refused
Pour la guilde : Il faudrait définir des sous-inventaires, ce qui serait complexe car le code n'a pas été prévu pour.
<![CDATA[[Will not be used] New Mektoub Command]]> Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:19:32 +0000 Refused Tamarea <![CDATA[[Refusée] Attaquer des bâtiments et les réparer.]]> Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:42:10 +0000 Refused Tamarea <![CDATA[[Will not be used] idea 42: pvp teleport controls?]]> Wed, 01 May 2013 19:27:39 +0000 Refused Cidreuppercut <![CDATA[[Non retenue] Tp de nation]]> Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:51:52 +0000 Refused
Par conséquent, cette idée ne peut pas être retenue.]]>
<![CDATA[[Non retenue] Coup Circulaire]]> Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:39:59 +0000 Refused Tamarea <![CDATA[[Non retenue] Point de Rez dans le Bosquet de la Confusion]]> Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:56:49 +0000 Refused Kitane <![CDATA[[Non retenue] Des chapeaux quand même ?]]> Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:52:18 +0000 Refused Tamarea <![CDATA[[Non retenue] Nouvelle pièce d'équipement pour l'armure légère]]> Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:32:38 +0000 Refused
En effet, les chapeaux et capuches font parties intégrantes des coiffures et non des pièces d'armure. De plus, l'ajout d'un tel gain de régénération ne serait pas possible sans une modification conséquente du code.]]>
<![CDATA[[Refusé] Tag pvp OP et compte gratuit]]> Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:24:21 +0000 Refused Oura <![CDATA[[DECLINED]Stackable items with identical stats]]> Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:51:14 +0000 Refused Reallocdev(arispotle)