ИДЕЯ ДЛЯ РИЗОМА


uiWebPrevious123456789uiWebNext

#20 [en] 

Lacuna
Lacuna hates males. She is a toon. I don't want one in my life but I have no problem with them as long as they wash regularly and don't try to make me watch football :P
Brah! Lets go get drinks at the bar! ;)

Edited 2 times | Last edited by Jetlag (9 лет назад)

---

#21 Многоязычный 

Многоязычный | [English]
Lacuna: I fully agree that this man hating is RP (which french hating is not and cannot be). Me, Daomei, I am a fairly hedonistic and immoral person, taking my fun where I get it. My little sister, Diwu, being more earnest, romantic, and moral due to her personality and her fairly hard biography as a young child, often scolds me as a slut and a drunkard (well, she isn't completely wrong, but so what). So I am deriding and joking about extremist attitudes between the sexes, I think those who employ them, no matter whether moralistic or man hating, are missing joy. Just my opinion :).

---

Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral

#22 [en] 

Jetlag
Lacuna
Lacuna hates males. She is a toon. I don't want one in my life but I have no problem with them as long as they wash regularly and don't try to make me watch football :P
Brah! Lets go get drinks at the bar! ;)


If it is a Sports Bar, I may decide lacuna is right :P

---

#23 Многоязычный 

Многоязычный | English
Btw.: if we start to blame each other, men, french, kamis, karas, marauders, whatever ..
I strongly recommend this one:



Hope it helps

Last edited by Daomei (9 лет назад)

---

Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral

#24 [en] 

Can we please make a new thread for Ranger Tears and let this one stay as it was intended? For maraduers? Yes I agree Ranger needs to be fixed too but that should have nothing to do with the discussion of Marauders being fixed. We can see we have views that differ but in the end we all want everything fixed. This is the Marauders Tears thread, only evil tears allowed here friends!

#25 Многоязычный 

Многоязычный | English
Bones: There are no rangers' tears. We are not complaining (though we had more reason for than the marauders, as our faction got ways more brazenly sabotaged than the marauders' ever has been). I just made a comparison. I would not "crie" nor even complain if the marauder tp access to Almati, which I support, would be installed prior to a comparable rangers' access.

---

Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral

#26 [en] 

I was just having fun...When we discuss or are opposed often people lable it as tears. I wanted to say it first though :) I do agree that Ranger should have direct access to many other spaces. Things were just done half assed to please us. I did say though that I agree Rangers should own Almati.
I was just adding to the fun because even someone as evil as me enjoys a good laugh too :P

#27 Многоязычный 

Многоязычный | English
Ideas for the exit missions for marauders:
0: Renouncing maraudership should end up in death with DP. Everything else would be ridiculous.
1: Checking out at Zinuakeen. The former marauder has to access every zinuakeen to renounce her/his checkin.
2. Recompense the guards murdered previously. This may become tricky. Access every of the 4 guards (right click) to obtain a recompensation mission. Mind that invul/MPA may be necessary for. The guard will ask you to harvest (or gain) some excellent mat of the region, some of every season/daytime. This is just an idea, as this may be too easy if others harvest or provide the mat. It may be mission mat to avoid that, but then, the level of the former marauder has to be taken in account: a level 100 digging marauder cannot be compelled to dig q200 mission mat. So pls think about and make proposals.
3. Other recompensations. Open to proposals.

Baseline is that it should be hard, but interesting and challenging. It might be a blueprint for revocation of K/K and nation negative fames as well.

---

Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral

#28 [en] 

Exit mission for a marauder would be ok, yes if difficult. I myself wouldn't have a problem just doing fame missions the current way to fix myself if I did ever want to go back but my intentions are to stay Marauder.
I would have stuck with Ranger if the implementation would have been better. The missions finding the pathways was great.
I know longer hold any values or ideals from Karavan or Kami so I could never go back to either of them. I have worked fame to max and back down and back up many times, it gave me something to do. I think most left because they got tired of the waiting and not the wanting to go back part being too hard. I can't speak for everyone of course but this is the feeling that I personally saw. It would be great to hear from those players on their thoughts if they still browse these forums.

#29 [en] 

***Deleted***

Last edited by Kanzaburo (9 лет назад)

#30 Многоязычный 

Just as a remark and response to Lacuna: I do not consider our Atys nations modern nation states. The empire resembles to some extent antique Greek/Roman statehood (without slavery as the base), the kingdom Italian renaissance kingdoms, the federation Swiss republic, and the theocracy .. well, pick any theocracy, substracting its inherent barbary. All those comparisons, of course, are ideal typical in the sense of Max Weber. The marauders of the ancient lands may resemble the Golden Horde or the mongols of the 13th century, to some extent, yet their program of world dominance and extermination of any dissent reminds me to something worse no "savages" ever had. So let us bury half-bred analogies.

In fact, the four nations are able to coexist, so are the two cults, despite their quarrels. The clans of the marauders do not seem to be able to more than a state of frozen war with the rest of hominity so far. OOC spoken, we may agree that the marauders will never gain their endsieg which would end the world of Atys we know ;). Yet I even fail to see a base for their recognition as a nation.

They may be a faction, "superior" to rangers and Trytonists under some respect, I have no problem with that. But I want more precise analyses what hinders the marauders to flourish and should be implemented, not just a list of complaints and wishes.

---

Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral

#31 [en] 

Hello,

It seems necessary to remind the community of the basic rules about using Ryzom channels. Everyone must act as a polite and civilized individuals, and be respectful with WinchGate staff. Foul language and xenophobic talk are also prohibited. 

The forum is a place to exchange thoughts and of debate, in a good atmosphere for discussions. Animosity and agressive behavior against Ryzom staff is not something that is tolerated. Marauder players have the chance to have a volunteer who is dedicated and responsible for Marauders, and who spends all of his free time to work for them. He has explained during an OOC meeting, what he and some Ryzom teams are working on together for Marauders, and nearly everything that has been requested on the forums by players, is exactly what he stated was in progress with the team at in his OOC meeting. Such disrespectful comments from a part of the community are just unfair and demotivating for all the staff and are unacceptable.

I have also moderated several xenophobic posts. Such a behaviour is also unacceptable in a Ryzom channel.

I invite some of you to read again the Code of Conduct of Ryzom Services and to respect it. Please consider this as a general warning to the community. For those who continue to disregard these rules, the next time it will be more than a warning.

---

Tamarea
Ryzom Team Manager
(FR / EN / ES)

tamarea@ryzom.com

#32 [en] 

I did not re-read the Lore before writing this, but this seems to be one of the rather rare times I'm with Daomei regarding the acceptance of the Marauders as a kind of nation. It's not a, say, homogenic whole. It's a collection of Outcasts from various ways of life, and for very different reasons. Their intentions differ a lot (not least in RP), and they are made up from psychotic murderers to charming rogues, from heretics to traitors to pocket thieves. Not nearly all want the "other" Homins dead, especially not those who, in a way, live from them (thieves, mercenaries etc.). It's not impossible to have business with some of them, but if they were a real nation, bound only to the will and command of Melkiar the Black Varinx and his fierce daughter, any business - any interplay apart from PvP - with them would be impossible, and therefore they would be even more cut out of things than they are now. I guess some Marauder players won't care - others would.

I want to address the theory of the "left behind in the Old Lands". There can be little doubt that not all Homins made it in time to the Rainbow bridges. Many others choosed to stay behind (Muang/Marung, for example). Most Marauders weren't even born then - many were born in the New Lands, and/or joined the Marauders long after the Swarming. When the Second Swarming came, the Marauders received the offer to flee with most of Hominkind to a safe place, but again decided to stay (Akilia made it very clear that she and her people won't go). So the idea of the Marauders taking revenge for their neglection during the Swarmings make sense only for a very limited amount of them, but not for the others, who socialised with other Homins before deciding to join an on the whole anti-social organisation.

---

Salazar Caradini
Filira Matia
Royal Historian
Member of the Royal Academy of Yrkanis
First Seraph of the Order of the Argo Navis

#33 [en] 

Tamarea,

Have you examined the retention rate of players that have taken the marauder rite? From my in-game observations it is much lower than that of other factions during the same time period, however maybe there is data that shows otherwise.

With all respect to the volunteers and staff- I am seeing my friends try the marauder faction and then disappear from the game when they see that it is not enjoyable and difficult to reverse that alignment. This is very demotivating and unacceptable to me.

The Marauder players think that their faction needs more content to be viable- Probably to the point that you will need to build them a fully functional capital or nation.

I however am arguing that even with new content the Marauder faction will not thrive because it isolates a group of players from the larger community. The point of Atys, in my humble opinion, is that the different factions do interact, but with marauders there is no room for compromise. Their leaders have declared war on all the other factions, so whether they like it or not, they are the bad guys- and this does not make the game enjoyable for Marauders or the rest of the players. So not being able to compromise and interact nicely with the Marauder faction is an inherent flaw that will not be solved, regardless of how much new marauder content is added.

These are the reasons why I think the playable marauder faction is not a good investment and that action (like phasing it out completely, or indicating that additional marauder content is not a priority, or adding a mission to allow players to more easily un-do the marauder conversion process) needs to be taken:
1) The playable marauder faction does not make the game more enjoyable
2) it would take too much work to satisfy their growing needs/requests
3) players are leaving the game because of it.

#34 [en] 

Placio, there have been many players forced out of this game due to every Faction. The general population is nice. I was a proud Karavaneer from the beginning of this game until the last day when the server first closed. Some players chose to be very rude and take things too far. Some left. I stayed but joined the Kami until the same thing happened to me in that faction as well. I tried Rangers but again, I am not as good at RP as many here are so I didn't feel like I belong there either. I don't know where I would go if there was no longer a marauder faction and I'm sure others feel the same way too so it does bring enjoyment to some in this game, it is unfortunate that it did not for your friends. I couldn't be truly neutral if I was still at war with the other factions if marauder was taken out so where would I go? This may sound selfish but maybe others feel the same as I do, I don't know. With in game alliances there has to be a place for outcasts/exiles.
uiWebPrevious123456789uiWebNext
 
Last visit Суббота, 30 Ноября 11:10:08 UTC
P_:G_:PLAYER

powered by ryzom-api