#99 Eingetragen von Dukenono vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
2 mal geändert | Zuletzt geändert von Dukenono (vor 7 Jahren)
---
#100 Eingetragen von Arfur vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
I.... this is not what I expected.I was hoping that dappers could be purchased for real money, and what can be purchased with dappers would be increased.
#101 Eingetragen von Sinvaders vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
#102 Eingetragen von Gidget vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
NudgeI.... this is not what I expected.I was hoping that dappers could be purchased for real money, and what can be purchased with dappers would be increased.That sounds like a pay to win system, which I'm pretty sure would not be acceptable.
Zuletzt geändert von Gidget (vor 7 Jahren)
#103 Eingetragen von Skiy vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
Zuletzt geändert von Skiy (vor 7 Jahren)
#104 Eingetragen von Nudge vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
#105 Eingetragen von Aenigma vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
My thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.
#106 Eingetragen von Nudge vor 7 Jahren Melden | Zitieren
NudgeMy thought was that such financial structure would bring in new players. I see your point, and can understand why that makes more sense.Yet, there is little to no effort in this structure that would attract new players.Worse, existing F2Ps seem to be punished.Nudge, if those of us who pay each month had only the same items as those who are f2P the game would probably cease to exist within a couple months.Try to see it as rewarding for monthly payments, rather than punishment for F2P, please? ;)
powered by ryzom-api