search | Login Forums | New posts | Last 24h

IDEAS FOR RYZOM
PvP tags for individually attackable Mektoub pets?
Yes, this is logical and should be implimented 13 (2)
65.0%
Yes, but they should not be hitable by AoE damage or Heals 2
10.0%
No way, ranged is my meal ticket, you can't take that away from me. 1
5.0%
No, this is illogical and should not be implimented 4
20.0%
Other 0
Abstain 3
uiWebPrevious1uiWebNext

#1 Added by Loryen 1 decade ago [en] 

{translate}
I think packers and mounts should take the same PvP flag as their owners and be individually targetable. If I can attack someone who is tagged for PvP then I should likewise be able to target their packers and mounts. Flagged packers should also be hit by AoE/multishot effects (I have no care one way or another about whether they can be healed, but I assume logically they should also absorb heals like a PC if they take damage like one).

It just seems illogical to me that someone could run around with 3 packers of ammo to shoot someone with, but that person being hit cannot take out the packers except by using environmental effects like yelk gas or digging explosions.

#2 Added by Marelli(arispotle) 1 decade ago [en] 

{translate}
Just as long as someone's packers left in the capital don't suddenly get killable because their owner walked into the PR :p

#3 Added by Loryen 1 decade ago [en] 

{translate}
Maybe that would teach them to put their packers away. I see not concern with that situation (but I admittedly did not foresee that concern).

#4 Added by Ulykus 1 decade ago [en] 

{translate}
I agree that invulnerable meks look something unnatural but my concern is that attackers can't use launchers anymore and almost nothing changes for the defending guild.
uiWebPrevious1uiWebNext
  
Last visit Thursday, 18 April 09:02:03 UTC
P_:

powered by ryzom-api