IDEAS FOR RYZOM


PvP tags for individually attackable Mektoub pets?
Yes, this is logical and should be implimented 13 (2)
65.0%
Yes, but they should not be hitable by AoE damage or Heals 2
10.0%
No way, ranged is my meal ticket, you can't take that away from me. 1
5.0%
No, this is illogical and should not be implimented 4
20.0%
Otro 0
Abstenerse 3
uiWebPrevious1uiWebNext

#1 [en] 

I think packers and mounts should take the same PvP flag as their owners and be individually targetable. If I can attack someone who is tagged for PvP then I should likewise be able to target their packers and mounts. Flagged packers should also be hit by AoE/multishot effects (I have no care one way or another about whether they can be healed, but I assume logically they should also absorb heals like a PC if they take damage like one).

It just seems illogical to me that someone could run around with 3 packers of ammo to shoot someone with, but that person being hit cannot take out the packers except by using environmental effects like yelk gas or digging explosions.

#2 [en] 

Just as long as someone's packers left in the capital don't suddenly get killable because their owner walked into the PR :p

#3 [en] 

Maybe that would teach them to put their packers away. I see not concern with that situation (but I admittedly did not foresee that concern).

#4 [en] 

I agree that invulnerable meks look something unnatural but my concern is that attackers can't use launchers anymore and almost nothing changes for the defending guild.
uiWebPrevious1uiWebNext
 
Last visit miércoles 1 mayo 10:29:29 UTC
P_:

powered by ryzom-api