While I agree that OP fights are PvP events, not warfare simulation, I don't see that the reward for holding an OP is so much too low. OP ownership is not only gain of OP mat, it is an advantage in GH access, and a gain of prestige. There has even been a proposal to activate additional OPs without production in order to give more guilds the opportunity to win and hold an OP.
Feign attacks on OPs are legitimate when serving tactical purposes, mainly by simultaneous declarations causing uncertainty where the real attack is intended. Just clicking to unnerve the opponent is already against CoC to my knowledge. But 2 occurences during several months do not really support such a suspicion.
In this particular case, it seems appropriate to me just to ask the initiators by tell or IG mail why the declaring guild and their allies (mostly) did not show up. That would be better than just speculating an complaining.
For those who like PvP fights the lower level OPs should be a good low cost opportunity to initiate a fight. The defenders have to live with.
Feign attacks on OPs are legitimate when serving tactical purposes, mainly by simultaneous declarations causing uncertainty where the real attack is intended. Just clicking to unnerve the opponent is already against CoC to my knowledge. But 2 occurences during several months do not really support such a suspicion.
In this particular case, it seems appropriate to me just to ask the initiators by tell or IG mail why the declaring guild and their allies (mostly) did not show up. That would be better than just speculating an complaining.
For those who like PvP fights the lower level OPs should be a good low cost opportunity to initiate a fight. The defenders have to live with.
---
Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral