Casy, I understand your reasoning, and welcome your polemic-free way of explaining your point.
Yet, if taking the poll by face value, I see over 57% voting against the current scheme of distributed grades and for the one or the other scheme of grouped grades of the same material, and bit less then 40% in favor of it.
On the other hand, nearly 80% are voting for either the current or the previous status quo. So there seems to be an overwhelming majority of "the lazy". :)
Further on, it is not clear whether those voting for a grouped scheme are doing so because they are preferring a grouped over a distributed scheme, or because they want the current bug(s) to be worked around.
Though most may be fed up by this strange "vote", I am thinking about a survey with open votes, asking whether the participants prefer
- grouped or distributed grades of given materials (independent from the current bug)
- current distribution, old distribution or redistribution of material
Yet, if taking the poll by face value, I see over 57% voting against the current scheme of distributed grades and for the one or the other scheme of grouped grades of the same material, and bit less then 40% in favor of it.
On the other hand, nearly 80% are voting for either the current or the previous status quo. So there seems to be an overwhelming majority of "the lazy". :)
Further on, it is not clear whether those voting for a grouped scheme are doing so because they are preferring a grouped over a distributed scheme, or because they want the current bug(s) to be worked around.
Though most may be fed up by this strange "vote", I am thinking about a survey with open votes, asking whether the participants prefer
- grouped or distributed grades of given materials (independent from the current bug)
- current distribution, old distribution or redistribution of material
---
Daomei die Streunerin - religionsneutral, zivilisationsneutral, gildenneutral