#16 Añadido por Sinvaders 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#17 Añadido por Moniq 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#18 Añadido por Revvy 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
True. Why not simply make neutrals in battle zone attackable by both sides? It is same risk as if you enter PvP zone... even higher. Why not do it same way if you wish not to join either side?
Última edición por Revvy (5 años hace)
---
#19 Añadido por Jahuu 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#20 Añadido por Revvy 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
Hmm, or no sides, but ability to heal/attack anyone whenever in OP, PvP zones, tagged.. Leagues already do the side selecting anyway ^^
#21 Añadido por Sinvaders 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#22 Añadido por Jahuu 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
JahuuHmm, or no sides, but ability to heal/attack anyone whenever in OP, PvP zones, tagged.. Leagues already do the side selecting anyway ^^For PvP zone and tagged, its the case already for everyone, not only pseudo neutral.For OP, if a neutral as the possibility to heal then he isn't neutral anymore, if he has the possibility to attack, then he isn't a neutral anymore.And if he can do this, and not been attackable, its ridiculous.Moniq suggestion was to create a sort of "void" status, like a renegade status into OP, if you stay without choosing a side, you are categorized Renegade, and can attack anyone -> but anyone can attack you yoo.Thinking about it... it would allow a 3 party's fight instead of 2, which is quite interesting !
#23 Añadido por Placio 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#24 Añadido por Craftjenn 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
https://fr.wiki.ryzom.com/wiki/Utilisatrice:Craftjenn
#25 Añadido por Revvy 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#26 Añadido por Laoviel 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#27 Añadido por Tryroamer 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#28 Añadido por Placio 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
#29 Añadido por Siela 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
At all other times in all other places, a non-pvp interested player,cannot be pvp attacked without her/his consent. And should such a pvp assault nevertheless be somehow carried out, thatn that must have been via an exploit and thus against the rules here.
But if said non-pvp interested player simply happen to be in a OP battle area when that battle ensues, why not simply let the poor sap (me for example) tp on out of there as quickly as the game mechanics make possible ??
But i plead in all earnest and heartpain for allowing a mere refugee of such a situation to flee for her/his life and limb and inventory safety via tp instead of having to choose a side. Do not force pvp on non-pvp interested persons please.
#30 Añadido por Naema 5 años hace Reportar | Citar
powered by ryzom-api