#1 Eingetragen von Kimmerin vor 7 Jahren
---
#2 Eingetragen von Azazor vor 7 Jahren
Zuletzt geändert von Tiximei (vor 7 Jahren) | Grund: Fixed the language button
#3 Eingetragen von Naema vor 7 Jahren
#4 Eingetragen von Bitttymacod vor 7 Jahren
#5 Eingetragen von Afriel vor 7 Jahren
#6 Eingetragen von Bluaarbthi vor 7 Jahren
#7 Eingetragen von Kimmerin vor 7 Jahren
it isn't as expensive to declare on a small OP, is that true?
They bring 3 people since Guild B (who currently owns it) only has 3 active members. Since Guild A is Kami, the Kara Alliance (or whatever) brings 30
This situation is similar to previous attacks on kami outposts where 1-2 (clowns as you call it) will show on the attackers side and more than 10 on the defending side. Of course respawn point are nearby for these outpost being harassed as you call it. Sadly it was not mention on this thread up until now.
Owning an OP doesn't only have merits, as an owner you should take the flaws with it imo
5 mal geändert | Zuletzt geändert von Kimmerin (vor 7 Jahren)
#8 Eingetragen von Sinvaders vor 7 Jahren
The problem I see with the proposed solutions is that they represent the possibility of harassment in the opposite direction. Guild A declares on Psykopla Knoll (q50). They bring 3 people since Guild B (who currently owns it) only has 3 active members. Since Guild A is Kami, the Kara Alliance (or whatever) brings 30, beats Guild A's team into a pulp and then reports Guild A for harassment.
#9 Eingetragen von Mjollren vor 7 Jahren
#10 Eingetragen von Bitttymacod vor 7 Jahren
BitttymacodThe problem I see with the proposed solutions is that they represent the possibility of harassment in the opposite direction. Guild A declares on Psykopla Knoll (q50). They bring 3 people since Guild B (who currently owns it) only has 3 active members. Since Guild A is Kami, the Kara Alliance (or whatever) brings 30, beats Guild A's team into a pulp and then reports Guild A for harassment.Why a guild with only 3 active members hold an OP ?If you are not ready to fight/wait to keep your OP just give it to someone else in your faction.
#11 Eingetragen von Ingfarah vor 7 Jahren
#12 Eingetragen von Gidget vor 7 Jahren
When you declare war, you shouldn't expect to win "only if they don't notice", or "only if they're busy elsewhere", or "only if they don't deem it worth it".
#13 Eingetragen von Daomei vor 7 Jahren
#14 Eingetragen von Kimmerin vor 7 Jahren
It is the fate of OP holders that they have to guard their OP as long as they want to hold it.
The weakness of NPC guards and the relatively low cost of declaration of war allows smaller attacking teams to start such a PvP event. This opportunity is legitimate and should be preserved.
In the case mentioned, I know two active players of the guild in question, and do not believe that they intended harrassment.
2 mal geändert | Zuletzt geändert von Kimmerin (vor 7 Jahren)
#15 Eingetragen von Nudge vor 7 Jahren
powered by ryzom-api